Recently, I’ve noticed that more people are sharing about how they rate books. Some people are still doing star ratings, and some are abandoning it altogether. So, I wanted to take a moment to talk about how I rate books. Personally, I still like the star rating. I’m a visual person, so that helps me a lot. But I rate books solely based on how they make me feel. I read for fun. I don’t consider myself a critic, and I don’t focus on technique unless it influences my enjoyment of the story. I’ve written enough critical essays in my time. I wanted to get back to the fun of literature. That’s why Wildwood Reads is purely about the enjoyment of reading. So, let’s get into what my ratings mean.
5/5 Stars
I loved this book. It’s top tier. I will think about this book for weeks after reading it.
4/5 Stars
I liked this book. I had a fun time reading it, but it didn’t give me the five-star feeling. Something technical could have kept me from completely loving it (which I’ll mention in the review). Or, it could have just been that I didn’t completely connect with the story.
3/5 Stars
3/5 isn’t a negative review in my world. I didn’t love it, but I didn’t completely dislike it. This is usually where I start noting technical issues that took me out of the story. I try to analyze the exact reason that the book didn’t completely work for me.
2/5 Stars
I didn’t like this book. Either the subject, characters, or all of the above didn’t work for me. I never want to completely bash a book, so I will try to point out my dislikes in a helpful way.
1/5 Stars
I will rarely have a 1/5 stars. I usually dnf a book if I feel like there is nothing that I can like about it. Again, I read for enjoyment and if I’m not enjoying anything I’d rather cut my losses and try something else.
So that’s how I rate my books. What about you? I’d like to hear your thoughts in the comments below.
Discover more from Wildwood Reads
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
My rating system is similar to yours. Love it at 5 stars, liked it a lot at 4, and thought it was okay at 3. Like you, I rarely rate books at one star because I don’t finish them if they’re that difficult for me to vibe with.
I try to use a mix of objectivity and subjectivity while rating my books, but, honestly speaking, my system is probably very similar to yours 😂 Like, if I hated a book, I’ll probably find some technical world building or writing or character development aspects to complain about, too, and if I loved a book, I’m probably going to be more forgiving of flaws.
I think my star ratings might be a tad more generous than yours, though – like, if I give something three star rating, it still means I enjoyed reading the book; it just isn’t something that stuck out enough to be particularly memorable. And, although they’re definitely my rarest rating, I do give one star reviews from time to time if I really hated something and can’t find any redeeming literary qualities about it, either 😅 But maybe that’s also due to me basically never DNFing anything and pushing through even the most terrible books once I’ve started them…
I can’t push through. I’m such a mood reader. If I don’t like a book that I’m reading I just won’t read at all. So I’ve learned to bypass that bad habit. 😂